Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg
vs
California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate
Supplement Comparison

  • Zinc: California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate has 67% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 2 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg vs California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg have?

  • Zinc appears as TRAACS Zinc Bisglycinate (Albion)

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate have?

  • Zinc appears as Zinc Picolinate

Which categories do Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg and California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate belong to?

  • Single Mineral

What health concerns do Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg and California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate address?

  • Eye Health
  • Immune System Support
  • Men's Health
  • Skin, Hair & Nail Health
  • Antioxidant Support
  • General Health

Which product has a higher amount of Zinc per serving?

  • California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate has the highest total amount of Zinc: 50 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Zinc Bisglycinate 30 mg: 1 capsule
    • California Gold Nutrition Zinc Picolinate: 1 capsule
  • Zinc
    • This supplement has 30 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 11 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 8 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 40 mg
  • Zinc
    • This supplement has 50 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 11 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 8 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 40 mg

Last updated: February 9, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team