Thorne Super EPA - NSF
vs
Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg
Supplement Comparison

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA): Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg has 2.8× more
  • EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified): Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg has 73% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 6 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Super EPA - NSF vs Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg.

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Super EPA - NSF have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Unspecified
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Unspecified

Which active ingredients does Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Ethyl Esters (EE)

Which categories do Thorne Super EPA - NSF and Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg belong to?

  • Fish Oil and Omega-3

What health concerns do Thorne Super EPA - NSF and Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg address?

  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Eye Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Immune System Support
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified) per serving?

  • Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg has the highest total amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified): 1200 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Super EPA - NSF: 1 gelcap
    • Metagenics OmegaGenics® Fish Oil EPA 1200 mg: 1 softgel

Last updated: January 3, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team