Thorne Rhodiola
vs
Metagenics Adreset®
Supplement Comparison

  • Rhodiola Extract: same total amount on both labels
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 6 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Rhodiola vs Metagenics Adreset®.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Rhodiola have?

  • Rhodiola Extract

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Adreset® have?

  • Rhodiola Extract appears as Rhodiola Extract (standardized to 1% salidroside, 3% rosavins)
  • Asian Ginseng Extract appears as Asian Ginseng (Panax ginseng) Root Extract standardized to 8% ginsenosides
  • Cordyceps appears as Cordyceps Mycelium (Paecilomyces hepiali Chen) Extract standardized to 4% cordycepic acid and 0.25% adenosine

Which categories do Thorne Rhodiola and Metagenics Adreset® belong to?

  • Herbal Extract
  • Single Mineral

What health concerns do Thorne Rhodiola and Metagenics Adreset® address?

  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Energy & Metabolism
  • Mood Support
  • Sleep Quality
  • Stress Management

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Rhodiola: 1 capsule
    • Metagenics Adreset®: 2 capsules

Last updated: January 29, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team