Thorne Quercetin Complex
vs
Metagenics Sinuplex
Supplement Comparison

  • Quercetin: Thorne Quercetin Complex has 25% more
  • Bromelain: Thorne Quercetin Complex has 2.0× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 9 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Quercetin Complex vs Metagenics Sinuplex.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Quercetin Complex have?

  • Quercetin appears as Quercetin Phytosome
  • Bromelain

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Sinuplex have?

  • Vitamin C appears as Ascorbic Acid
  • N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC)
  • Quercetin
  • Bromelain appears as Bromelain (from pineapple stem, 2,400 GDU/gram)
  • Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) Root appears as Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) Root 7:1 Extract

Which categories do Thorne Quercetin Complex and Metagenics Sinuplex belong to?

  • Antioxidant Complex
  • Herbal Extract

What health concerns do Thorne Quercetin Complex and Metagenics Sinuplex address?

  • Antioxidant Support
  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Immune System Support
  • Respiratory Health

Which product has a higher amount of Quercetin per serving?

  • Thorne Quercetin Complex has the highest total amount of Quercetin: 250 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Quercetin Complex: 1 capsule
    • Metagenics Sinuplex: 1 tablet
  • Vitamin C
    • This supplement has 150 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 90 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 75 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2000 mg

Last updated: February 11, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team