Thorne Magnesium CitraMate
vs
Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian
Supplement Comparison

  • Magnesium: Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian has 11% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 5 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Magnesium CitraMate vs Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian.

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Magnesium CitraMate have?

  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Citrate
  • Magnesium appears as DiMagnesium Malate

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian have?

  • Calcium appears as Calcium Citrate
  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Oxide

Which categories do Thorne Magnesium CitraMate and Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian belong to?

  • Single Mineral
  • Joint Formula

What health concerns do Thorne Magnesium CitraMate and Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian address?

  • Muscle Support
  • Blood Sugar Support
  • Energy & Metabolism
  • General Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Joint & Bone Health
  • Recovery & Repair
  • Sleep Quality
  • Stress Management

Which product has a higher amount of Magnesium per serving?

  • Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian has the highest total amount of Magnesium: 150 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Magnesium CitraMate: 1 capsule
    • Metagenics Bone Builder® Vegetarian: 1 tablet
  • Calcium
    • This supplement has 200 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1000 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1000 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2500 mg

Last updated: January 3, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team