Thorne Curcumin Phytosome
vs
California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract
Supplement Comparison

  • Turmeric: Thorne Curcumin Phytosome has 2.5× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 5 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Curcumin Phytosome vs California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Curcumin Phytosome have?

  • Turmeric appears as Meriva Curcumin Phytosome

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract have?

  • Turmeric appears as Turmeric Root Extract (Curcuma longa) (rhizome) (Standardized to 95% Curcuminoids)
  • Turmeric appears as Turmeric Powder (Curcuma longa) (root)
  • Boswellia appears as Boswellin Boswellia Extract (Boswellia serrata) (gum resin) (Standardized to 70% Total Boswellic Acids)

Which categories do Thorne Curcumin Phytosome and California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract belong to?

  • Antioxidant Complex
  • Herbal Extract
  • Joint Formula

What health concerns do Thorne Curcumin Phytosome and California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract address?

  • Antioxidant Support
  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Digestive Support
  • Joint & Bone Health
  • Liver & Detox Support
  • Recovery & Repair
  • General Health
  • Immune System Support

Which product has a higher amount of Turmeric per serving?

  • Thorne Curcumin Phytosome has the highest total amount of Turmeric: 1000 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Curcumin Phytosome: 2 capsules
    • California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract: 2 capsules

Last updated: February 21, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team