Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate
vs
Metagenics Hemagenics
Supplement Comparison

  • Calcium: Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate has 4.0× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 19 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate vs Metagenics Hemagenics.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate have?

  • Calcium appears as Calcium Malate
  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Malate

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Hemagenics have?

  • Vitamin B1 (Thiamin) appears as Thiamin Mononitrate
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) appears as Pyridoxine HCl
  • Vitamin B9 (Folate) appears as Calcium L-5-Methyltetrahydrofolate
  • Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) appears as Methylcobalamin
  • Calcium
  • Iron appears as Ferrous Bisglycinate
  • Phosphorus
  • Copper appears as Copper Lysinate HCl
  • Glycine
  • Succinic Acid

Which categories do Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate and Metagenics Hemagenics belong to?

  • Joint Formula
  • Single Mineral
  • Multivitamin

What health concerns do Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate and Metagenics Hemagenics address?

  • Muscle Support
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Joint & Bone Health
  • Energy & Metabolism
  • General Health
  • Immune System Support

Which product has a higher amount of Calcium per serving?

  • Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate has the highest total amount of Calcium: 100 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Thorne Calcium-Magnesium Malate: 1 capsule
    • Metagenics Hemagenics: 1 tablet
  • Calcium
    • This supplement has 100 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1000 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1000 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2500 mg
  • Vitamin B1 (Thiamin)
    • This supplement has 5 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1.2 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1.1 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine)
    • This supplement has 5 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1.3 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1.3 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 100 mg
  • Vitamin B9 (Folate)
    • This supplement has 1000 mcg DFE
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 400 mcg DFE
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 400 mcg DFE
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 1000 mcg DFE
  • Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin)
    • This supplement has 350 mcg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 2.4 mcg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 2.4 mcg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established
  • Calcium
    • This supplement has 25 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1000 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1000 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2500 mg
  • Iron
    • This supplement has 29 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 8 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 18 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 45 mg

Last updated: February 10, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team