Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails
vs
Metagenics ChondroCare
Supplement Comparison

  • Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM): Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails has 2.1× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 22 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails vs Metagenics ChondroCare.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails have?

  • Choline appears as Choline Bitartrate
  • PABA
  • Calcium
  • Inositol
  • Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM)
  • L-Cysteine appears as L-Cysteine HCl
  • Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) Extract

Which active ingredients does Metagenics ChondroCare have?

  • Zinc appears as Zinc Citrate
  • Selenium appears as L-Selenomethionine
  • Copper appears as Copper Citrate
  • Manganese appears as Manganese Citrate
  • Potassium appears as Potassium from D-Glucosamine Sulfate Potassium Chloride
  • Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM)
  • Glucosamine Sulfate appears as D-Glucosamine Sulfate Potassium Chloride
  • Chondroitin Sulfate

Which categories do Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails and Metagenics ChondroCare belong to?

  • Single Vitamin
  • Joint Formula

What health concerns do Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails and Metagenics ChondroCare address?

  • Skin, Hair & Nail Health
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) per serving?

  • Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails has the highest total amount of Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM): 700 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Swanson Hair, Skin & Nails: 1 tablet
    • Metagenics ChondroCare: 2 tablets
  • Choline
    • This supplement has 50 mg
    • Adequate Intake in men: 550 mg
    • Adequate Intake in women: 425 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 3500 mg
  • Calcium
    • This supplement has 35 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1000 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1000 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2500 mg
  • Zinc
    • This supplement has 5 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 11 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 8 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 40 mg
  • Selenium
    • This supplement has 100 mcg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 55 mcg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 55 mcg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 400 mcg
  • Copper
    • This supplement has 0.5 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 0.9 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 0.9 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 10 mg
  • Manganese
    • This supplement has 0.5 mg
    • Adequate Intake in men: 2.3 mg
    • Adequate Intake in women: 1.8 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 11 mg
  • Potassium
    • This supplement has 80 mg
    • Adequate Intake in men: 3400 mg
    • Adequate Intake in women: 2600 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established

Last updated: February 4, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team