Swanson Chromium Picolinate
vs
Douglas Laboratories Chromium Picolinate
Supplement Comparison

Chromium appears as Chromium Picolinate.

Chromium appears as Chromax Chromium Picolinate.

Blood Sugar Support. Energy & Metabolism.

Serving size: - Swanson Chromium Picolinate: 1 capsule - Douglas Laboratories Chromium Picolinate: 1 capsule

Chromium: This supplement has 200 mcg. Adequate Intake in men 35 mcg. Adequate Intake in women 25 mcg. Tolerable Upper Intake Level not established.

Chromium: This supplement has 250 mcg. Adequate Intake in men 35 mcg. Adequate Intake in women 25 mcg. Tolerable Upper Intake Level not established.

Chromium: Douglas Laboratories Chromium Picolinate has 25% more
The image below shows:
- Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
- Nutrient forms as listed on the label
- 2 nutrients compared

Frequently asked questions

Douglas Laboratories Chromium Picolinate has the highest total amount of Chromium: 250 mcg per serving

Serving size:
- Swanson Chromium Picolinate: 1 capsule
- Douglas Laboratories Chromium Picolinate: 1 capsule

Chromium
- This supplement has 200 mcg
- Adequate Intake in men: 35 mcg
- Adequate Intake in women: 25 mcg
- Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established

Chromium
- This supplement has 250 mcg
- Adequate Intake in men: 35 mcg
- Adequate Intake in women: 25 mcg
- Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established

Last updated: February 18, 2026

Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
Author: VIOscan Research Team