NOW Foods Red Omega
vs
Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH
Supplement Comparison

  • Coenzyme Q10: Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH has 67% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 9 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for NOW Foods Red Omega vs Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does NOW Foods Red Omega have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Unspecified
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Unspecified
  • Coenzyme Q10
  • Red Yeast Rice

Which active ingredients does Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH have?

  • Coenzyme Q10 appears as Kaneka Ubiquinol (Reduced CoQ10)

Which categories do NOW Foods Red Omega and Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH belong to?

  • Fish Oil and Omega-3
  • Antioxidant Complex
  • Single Vitamin

What health concerns do NOW Foods Red Omega and Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH address?

  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Cholesterol Support
  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Eye Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Antioxidant Support
  • Cellular Health
  • Energy & Metabolism

Which product has a higher amount of Coenzyme Q10 per serving?

  • Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH has the highest total amount of Coenzyme Q10: 100 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • NOW Foods Red Omega: 2 softgels
    • Source Naturals Ubiquinol CoQH: 1 softgel

Last updated: February 15, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team