Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate
vs
California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate
Supplement Comparison

  • Magnesium: California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate has 2.0× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 2 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate vs California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate have?

  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Bisglycinate

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate have?

  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Oxide and Magnesium Bisglycinate

Which categories do Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate and California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate belong to?

  • Single Mineral

What health concerns do Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate and California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate address?

  • Muscle Support
  • Nerve Health & Comfort Support
  • Sleep Quality
  • Stress Management
  • General Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of Magnesium per serving?

  • California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate has the highest total amount of Magnesium: 200 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Metagenics Magnesium Glycinate: 1 tablet
    • California Gold Nutrition Magnesium Bisglycinate: 2 capsules

Last updated: February 18, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team