Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate
vs
California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex
Supplement Comparison

  • Magnesium: California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex has 46% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 2 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate vs California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate have?

  • Magnesium appears as Magtein Magnesium L-Threonate

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex have?

  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Malate, Glycinate, Citrate

Which categories do Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate and California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex belong to?

  • Single Mineral

What health concerns do Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate and California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex address?

  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Men's Health
  • Sleep Quality
  • Muscle Support
  • General Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Joint & Bone Health
  • Stress Management

Which product has a higher amount of Magnesium per serving?

  • California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex has the highest total amount of Magnesium: 210 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Life Extension Neuro-Mag® Magnesium L-Threonate: 3 capsules
    • California Gold Nutrition Triple Magnesium Complex: 2 capsules

Last updated: February 13, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team