Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron
vs
California Gold Nutrition Lutein
Supplement Comparison

  • Lutein: same total amount on both labels
  • Zeaxanthin: Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron has 8.0× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 6 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron vs California Gold Nutrition Lutein.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron have?

  • Alpha-Carotene
  • Lutein
  • Zeaxanthin appears as Meso-Zeaxanthin and Zeaxanthin
  • Saffron Extract

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Lutein have?

  • Lutein appears as Lutein Marigold Flower Extract
  • Zeaxanthin appears as Zeaxanthin Marigold Flower Extract

Which categories do Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron and California Gold Nutrition Lutein belong to?

  • Antioxidant Complex

What health concerns do Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron and California Gold Nutrition Lutein address?

  • Antioxidant Support
  • Eye Health
  • Healthy Aging & Longevity

Which product has a higher amount of Lutein per serving?

  • Both products list the same total amount of Lutein per serving

Which product has a higher amount of Zeaxanthin per serving?

  • Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron has the highest total amount of Zeaxanthin: 4 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Life Extension MacuGuard Ocular Support with Saffron: 1 softgel
    • California Gold Nutrition Lutein: 1 softgel

Last updated: February 13, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team