Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine
vs
Metagenics Cortico-B5B6
Supplement Comparison

  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine): Metagenics Cortico-B5B6 has 4.0× more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 18 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine vs Metagenics Cortico-B5B6.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine have?

  • Vitamin B1 (Thiamin) appears as BenfoPure Benfotiamine
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) appears as Pyridoxal 5-Phosphate
  • Alpha Lipoic Acid
  • Grape (Vitis vinifera) Seed Extract appears as MegaNatural-BP Grape Seed Extract (90% phenolics)
  • French Maritime Pine Bark Extract (Pinus pinaster) appears as Enzogenol Pine Bark Extract (Pinus radiata)

Which active ingredients does Metagenics Cortico-B5B6 have?

  • Vitamin C appears as Ascorbic Acid
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) appears as Pyridoxine HCl
  • Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid) appears as D-Calcium Pantothenate
  • Calcium appears as D-Calcium Pantothenate
  • Magnesium appears as Magnesium Oxide
  • Citrus Bioflavonoid Complex

Which categories do Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine and Metagenics Cortico-B5B6 belong to?

  • Antioxidant Complex
  • B-Complex Formula

What health concerns do Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine and Metagenics Cortico-B5B6 address?

  • Antioxidant Support
  • Nerve Health & Comfort Support
  • Blood Sugar Support
  • General Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Stress Management

Which product has a higher amount of Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine) per serving?

  • Metagenics Cortico-B5B6 has the highest total amount of Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine): 100 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • Douglas Laboratories Ultra Benfotiamine: 1 capsule
    • Metagenics Cortico-B5B6: 1 tablet
  • Vitamin B1 (Thiamin)
    • This supplement has 150 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1.2 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1.1 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine)
    • This supplement has 25 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1.3 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1.3 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 100 mg
  • Vitamin C
    • This supplement has 240 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 90 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 75 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2000 mg
  • Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine)
    • This supplement has 100 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1.3 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1.3 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 100 mg
  • Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid)
    • This supplement has 500 mg
    • Adequate Intake in men: 5 mg
    • Adequate Intake in women: 5 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: Not established
  • Calcium
    • This supplement has 50 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in men: 1000 mg
    • Recommended Dietary Allowance in women: 1000 mg
    • Tolerable Upper Intake Level: 2500 mg

Last updated: February 9, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team