California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil
vs
Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s
Supplement Comparison

  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 4 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil vs Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s.

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)

Which active ingredients does Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)

Which categories do California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil and Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s belong to?

  • Fish Oil and Omega-3
  • Algae

What health concerns do California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil and Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s address?

  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Eye Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Immune System Support
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified) per serving?

  • California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil has the highest total amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified): 600 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • California Gold Nutrition Premium Omega-3 Fish Oil: 2 softgels
    • Metagenics OmegaGenics® Algae Omega-3s: 2 softgels

Last updated: January 2, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team