California Gold Nutrition Omega 800
vs
Amazon Elements Super Omega-3
Supplement Comparison

  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 6 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for California Gold Nutrition Omega 800 vs Amazon Elements Super Omega-3.

Try the VIOscan dashboard demo for free

Build comparison charts in seconds – no signup or card needed

This is a free preview of the $9.99/month premium dashboard

Use the interactive demo with multivitamins samples

Try Free Demo

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Omega 800 have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Natural Triglycerides (TG)

Which active ingredients does Amazon Elements Super Omega-3 have?

  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) appears as Unspecified
  • Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) appears as Unspecified

Which categories do California Gold Nutrition Omega 800 and Amazon Elements Super Omega-3 belong to?

  • Fish Oil and Omega-3

What health concerns do California Gold Nutrition Omega 800 and Amazon Elements Super Omega-3 address?

  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • Brain, Focus & Cognitive Function
  • Eye Health
  • Heart & Cardiovascular Health
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified) per serving?

  • Amazon Elements Super Omega-3 has the highest total amount of EPA + DHA (combined EPA+DHA content - individual amounts of EPA+DHA not specified): 1100 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • California Gold Nutrition Omega 800: 1 softgel
    • Amazon Elements Super Omega-3: 2 softgels

Last updated: February 3, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team