California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract
vs
Jarrow Curcumin 95
Supplement Comparison

  • Turmeric: Jarrow Curcumin 95 has 25% more
  • The image below shows:
    • Side-by-side charts with label nutrient amounts, per serving
    • Nutrient forms as listed on the label
    • 4 nutrients compared
Bar chart: per-serving label amounts and listed forms for California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract vs Jarrow Curcumin 95.

Frequently asked questions

Which active ingredients does California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract have?

  • Turmeric appears as Turmeric Root Extract (Curcuma longa) (rhizome) (Standardized to 95% Curcuminoids)
  • Turmeric appears as Turmeric Powder (Curcuma longa) (root)
  • Boswellia appears as Boswellin Boswellia Extract (Boswellia serrata) (gum resin) (Standardized to 70% Total Boswellic Acids)

Which active ingredients does Jarrow Curcumin 95 have?

  • Turmeric appears as Turmeric Root Extract (Curcuma longa) (rhizome) (Standardized to 95% Curcuminoids)

Which categories do California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract and Jarrow Curcumin 95 belong to?

  • Herbal Extract
  • Joint Formula

What health concerns do California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract and Jarrow Curcumin 95 address?

  • Antioxidant Support
  • Anti-Inflammatory Support
  • General Health
  • Immune System Support
  • Joint & Bone Health

Which product has a higher amount of Turmeric per serving?

  • Jarrow Curcumin 95 has the highest total amount of Turmeric: 500 mg per serving

How do the serving sizes compare between the two supplements?

  • Serving size:
    • California Gold Nutrition Boswellia Extract: 2 capsules
    • Jarrow Curcumin 95: 1 capsule

Last updated: January 2, 2026

  • Sources & Methodology: Nutrient data and forms are taken directly from Supplement Facts labels. Reviewed and standardized by the VIOscan Research Team. Learn more on the Methodology page.
  • We show the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) when available. If no RDA exists, we show the Adequate Intake (AI). Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL) are used for upper limits. Unless otherwise noted, RDAs shown correspond to healthy adults aged 19–50 years and are sex-specific. Separate values exist for 51–70 years and >70 years, and pregnancy and lactation are excluded. All values come from the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), Food and Nutrition Board (FNB).
  • Transparency: We’re funded by our users. We don’t have sponsors or affiliate links, and we don’t sell supplements.
  • Editorial standards: we provide independent, impartial and objective data analysis.
  • This analysis is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for medical advice.
  • Questions? Read our Frequently Asked Questions or contact us, we’re here to help.
  • See an error? Report it through our Contact page.
  • Author: VIOscan Research Team